How Did The Early Methodists Handle Ordination and Succession?

John-Wesley

Leadership succession in early Methodism was marked with a certain theological ambiguity, which stemmed from its founding father, John Wesley. Throughout his long life, he liked to consider himself a true son of the Anglican church, not the leader of a sect. As a true churchman, he believed there was divine merit in an apostolic succession, as it conveyed the historic commission of Jesus to Peter.

Wesley felt keenly the criticism that, in founding Methodism, he had stepped outside the Anglican branch of apostolic succession. He was also well aware that, having been only an Anglican priest and not a bishop, he could not himself ordain anyone to a higher office than that – but would need to in order to cover Methodism’s spread in two continents.

The matter came to a head with the arrival in England of Erasmus (Gerasimos), Orthodox bishop of Arcadia in Crete, who had been living in exile in Amsterdam. Wesley met him (conversing in Latin) and, as the Dictionary of Methodism states, ‘was tempted to see Erasmus as a providential means of obtaining ordination for some of his preachers.’ He had his preacher John Jones check Erasmus’s credentials with the Metropolitan (Archbishop) of Smyrna and he was satisfied.

Yet John and Charles Wesley quickly had misgivings, perhaps because of strict laws in England (statutes of Praemunire) forbidding any activity seen to promote foreign powers – represented by Erasmus. Against Charles’ advice, Jones was ordained by Erasmus at some date before March 1764. Some other Methodist preachers persuaded Erasmus to ordain them, without Wesley’s knowledge or consent.

This ushered in a time of confusion and accusation in the Methodist movement. Certain publications alleged that Wesley had bribed Erasmus to consecrate him as bishop, and Wesley had to defend himself: ‘I never entreated anything of Bishop Erasmus… I deny the fact.’ Wesley saw the need for caution, while re-evaluating his understanding of biblical ordination and his own empowerment to ordain. It would be 20 years before he consecrated Thomas Coke to be bishop of the Methodists in America.

At home, Wesley determined to appoint John Fletcher as his successor.  Swiss by birth, Fletcher was an Anglican priest but became an ardent supporter of Methodism. From 1757 onwards, when Fletcher was 28, he became Wesley’s coadjutor. Wesley wrote in his journal: “Mr. Fletcher helped me again. How wonderful are the ways of God! When my bodily strength failed, He sent me help from the mountains of Switzerland; and a help meet for me in every respect: where could I have found such another?” Fletcher quickly became the most influential person in Methodism next to John and Charles Wesley.

John Fletcher of Madeley

John Fletcher of Madeley

Fletcher’s numerous writings clarified and synthesized Wesley’s developing ideas. Wesley said they frequently consulted one another on the most important issues and that their friendship was sealed with mutual loyalty. Wesley further said: “We were of one heart and one soul. We had no secrets between us for many years; we did not purposely hide anything from each other.” Wesley spoke of “the strongest ties” between them and wrote of Fletcher: One equal to him I have not known—one so inwardly and outwardly devoted to God. So blameless a character in every respect I have not found either in Europe or America; nor do I expect to find another this side of eternity.

In 1773, Wesley invited Fletcher to become his successor. He told him that he was the only person qualified to serve as his sole replacement, noting his popularity with the preachers and his “clear understanding…of the Methodist doctrine and discipline.” Fletcher did not think it was the proper time to take on this responsibility. He believed his continuing task was to write as an interpreter of Wesley’s theology. In 1776, Wesley repeated the invitation, adding: “Should we not discern the providential time?”

Again, Fletcher declined. He knew that he was in failing health. So Wesley decided on a different path of action. At the Methodist Conference of 1784 (Fletcher’s last before he died aged 55), Wesley announced that, for the British Isles at least, he would nominate 100 preachers to serve jointly as his successors. For America, being free of laws of Praemunire meant Thomas Coke could act appointed the great circuit rider, Francis Asbury, to succeed him as the head of transatlantic Methodism.

Thomas Coke ordains Francis Asbury as bishop of the American Methodists

Thomas Coke ordains Francis Asbury as bishop of the American Methodists in 1784

It is perhaps noteworthy that the handing on of the bible that Wesley used for field preaching became a traditional symbol of Methodist succession.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

About Trevor Saxby

I'm a mentor, friend to many, with a PhD in church history. I love learning from the 'movers and shakers' of the past, as I want to be one today!

9 responses to “How Did The Early Methodists Handle Ordination and Succession?”

  1. Al DeFilippo says :

    Thank you for the post on Wesley, Fletcher, Coke, and Asbury. If you interest, here is a link to an article about John Wesley’s Foundry Church in London. The website for the trilogy about Francis Asbury has numerous articles, podcasts, videos, and pictures about these men and more. The Asbury Triptych Series opens with the book, Black Country, detailing early Methodism in England, focusing on Francis Asbury’s early preaching circuits in Great Britain. Enjoy.

  2. Al DeFilippo says :

    Almost forgot, the website is http://www.francisasburytriptych.com. Thank you.

  3. thesmilingpilgrim says :

    My moms a methodist lol 🙂 Love her to bits

  4. Ike12Stones says :

    That is a difficult issue to deal with – seems like almost every generation of believer has to re-invent the wheel. The Methodists actually seemed to do really well for several generations-worth of believers; longer than most other established ministries/denominations.

  5. Todd Stepp says :

    There is absolutely NO, ZERO evidence whatsoever, anywhere that this myth about John Wesley being consecrated a bishop ever took place at all, period! Further, it goes against Wesley’s own denial of the supposed event (which, if it had happened would make Wesley a liar). – It goes against everything that Wesley did say about his rationale for ordaining for America (again, if it had happened, making him a liar). And, it would have made Wesley, not only a liar, but would have provided none of the Methodists following him with any such supposed authority, since none of the Methodists following him have ever used this myth as their justification for holy orders; not Coke, Asbury, the Methodist Episcopal Church as a denomination or any of the other Methodist denominations that have arisen. – There is no scholarly evidence along these lines and plenty of evidence contrary to it.

    • Trevor Saxby says :

      I’m grateful for you flagging this up, Todd, because it got me looking at wider sources than I consulted when writing my post. The Dictionary of Methodism seems pretty clear: ‘Against Charles Wesley’s advice, [John] Jones was ordained by Erasmus at some date before March 1764. But John Wesley soon had cause for misgivings about the legality and advisability of the step; and he was quick to repudiate some of his preachers (including Laurence Coughlan) who, without his knowledge or consent, persuaded Erasmus to ordain them.’ I shall rework and reissue my piece.

Any comments?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.